The Great Gatsby and Oryx and Crake: Comparing the Pursuit of Ideals and Power
A
The central comparisonBoth The Great Gatsby and Oryx and Crake examine characters who try to replace an imperfect reality with an idealized one. Jay Gatsby wants to recover a perfect past with Daisy; Crake wants to redesign humanity itself. Their goals differ in scale, but each character treats reality as something that can be controlled.That gives you a strong comparative argument: the pursuit of an ideal becomes dangerous when it requires people, history, or nature to obey one person’s vision.Fitzgerald explores this through wealth, social class, and romantic longing. Atwood explores it through biotechnology, corporate power, and scientific rationalism. In both novels, power allows fantasy to become action—but cannot make the fantasy sustainable.Gatsby: power cannot purchase the pastGatsby’s ideal is built around Daisy, but she represents more than romantic love. She also signifies inherited status, social acceptance, and the life Gatsby believes he was denied.His wealth gives him practical power. He buys a mansion, stages extravagant parties, and arranges his life around Daisy’s presence across the bay. Yet his power has limits: he can imitate old money, but he cannot erase his origins or make Daisy conform completely to his imagined version of her.The green light captures this tension. It is visible and apparently reachable, but it remains distant. Fitzgerald therefore presents desire as self-renewing: once an ideal is approached, it moves further away.Gatsby’s insistence that the past can be repeated is not merely optimism. It reveals his central error—he treats time as controllable.Crake: power attempts to redesign humanityCrake’s ideal is a world without the traits he considers destructive: sexual jealousy, religious belief, racism, and uncontrolled population growth. Unlike Gatsby, he gains enough scientific and institutional power to impose his vision globally.The Crakers embody his attempted solution. Their biological design removes many sources of human conflict, but it also reduces human complexity. Crake decides which characteristics are defects without democratic consent or moral accountability.Atwood complicates his apparent rationality. Crake presents himself as logical, yet his project depends on secrecy, manipulation, and mass death. His desire to eliminate irrational behavior becomes an extreme expression of control.His power is also enabled by the corporate compounds, where knowledge is valuable mainly when it can be commercialized. Crake is not an isolated “mad scientist”; he is the product of a system that separates technical ability from ethical responsibility.A useful difference between the novelsAvoid arguing that Gatsby and Crake are simply “the same.” Strong comparison includes meaningful contrast.Atlas · Scribe AI
Subject deep dives · August 29, 2026
- Gatsby tries to restore a private past; Crake tries to create a universal future.
- Gatsby’s power is economic and performative; Crake’s is scientific and biological.
- Gatsby idealizes one person; Crake reduces all people to a design problem.
- Gatsby is destroyed by his dream; Crake’s dream helps destroy the existing world.
